Rome did not conquer the ancient world with a secret weapon. It conquered with an organisation: a body of ordinary men drilled, equipped and led so well that it could lose battle after battle and still win the war. That organisation was the legion.
Key points
- A legion was the basic unit of the Roman army, several thousand men strong, built from smaller units called cohorts and centuries.
- Legionaries fought with the short sword (gladius), the heavy javelin (pilum) and a large shield (scutum).
- Its strength was flexibility and discipline: it could change formation and keep fighting where a phalanx could not.
- The reforms associated with Marius helped turn it into a long-service, increasingly professional army whose soldiers looked to their general; a true standing army came under Augustus.
Ranks and cohorts
By the late Republic a legion was around 4,800 to 5,000 heavy infantry1, split into ten cohorts, each cohort made up of centuries led by a centurion. Earlier, in the manipular system, the line was drawn up in three staggered rows, the younger hastati in front, the seasoned principes behind2, and the veteran triarii in reserve, arranged in a checkerboard that let fresh units filter forward through tired ones. Around this core rode cavalry and marched light skirmishers and, later, allied and auxiliary troops.

The tools of the trade
The legionary's equipment was made for a particular way of fighting. He hurled the pilum, a heavy javelin designed to punch through shields and bend on impact1, then closed with the gladius, a short sword built for stabbing at arm's length behind the big curved scutum shield. Just as important were the tools he carried: every night on campaign the legion dug in2 and built a fortified camp.

Not one weapon, but discipline, engineering and the will to adapt.
Reform and flexibility
Around 107 BC the reforms linked to Gaius Marius3 opened the ranks to the landless poor4, equipped them at the state's expense (as tradition holds, though the practice was partly older) and turned the legion into a professional, long-service force5. What made it unbeatable in the long run was flexibility: its cohorts could manoeuvre over any ground and adapt to any foe. The older manipular legion, with the same flexibility, had already beaten the rigid5 Greek phalanx at Cynoscephalae and Pydna, and Rome recovered even from disasters like Cannae, where Hannibal destroyed a far larger Roman army, before Julius Caesar later wielded the legions to conquer Gaul at Alesia. Brush up on the terms in our military history glossary.

Sources and notes
Numbered notes in the text point to the works below.
- Adrian Goldsworthy, The Complete Roman Army (Thames & Hudson, 2003). ↩ a b
- Polybius, Histories, Book 6, 19 to 42 (levy; hastati, principes and triarii; arms including the pilum; the marching camp). Loeb translation online at LacusCurtius: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/6*.html. ↩ a b
- Sallust, The Jugurthine War (Bellum Iugurthinum), 86 (Marius enrols the capite censi in 107 BC). ↩
- World History Encyclopedia, “Roman Army” ↩
- Lawrence Keppie, The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire (Batsford, 1984). ↩ a b
- Wikipedia, “Roman legion”
