PLEnlist

18 March in military history: the Battle of Neerwinden, 1793

Military history · 18 March · War of the First Coalition · Full calendar

Late 18th-century etching of the Battle of Neerwinden: horsemen clash with sabers in the foreground amid fallen soldiers, while smoke rises beside a town with a tall church spire and lines of troops cross the rolling fields behind.
The Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793, in a Dutch print after a drawing by Jacques François Swebach-Desfontaines, engraved by R. Vinkeles and D. Vrydag. Public domain (CC0). Swebach-Desfontaines, Vinkeles and Vrydag, about 1794 to 1807, Rijksmuseum, via Wikimedia Commons.
Quick answer

On 18 March 1793 the French Revolutionary army of General Charles François Dumouriez attacked the Austrians of Prince Josias of Saxe-Coburg at Neerwinden, in what is now Belgium. After a day of fighting for the villages along the Little Gete, the French were beaten. Within three weeks Dumouriez had lost Belgium, arrested the Convention's commissioners and gone over to the enemy.

From Jemappes to the Gete

Dumouriez was the hero of the previous autumn. On 6 November 1792 he beat the Austrians at Jemappes, and by the end of the year French armies had overrun the Austrian Netherlands. When France declared war on Britain and the Dutch Republic on 1 February 1793, he turned north and invaded Holland, while General Francisco de Miranda besieged Maastricht.1

The Austrians used the respite. Coburg crossed the Roer, routed the French covering force at Aldenhoven on 1 March and forced them to give up the siege of Maastricht. Dumouriez hurried south to take over the army in Belgium and, judging that his men's morale could not stand a retreat, went over to the attack. After skirmishing around Tirlemont, now Tienen, Coburg drew up his army behind the Little Gete, with Archduke Charles on the right and Count Clerfayt on the left around the villages of Neerwinden and Oberwinden. The French had won a famous victory on the same ground in 1693.2

The battle

The two armies were of similar size, but the figures vary between historians. The World History Encyclopedia, which follows Ramsay Weston Phipps, gives Dumouriez about 40,000 infantry and 4,500 cavalry against some 30,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry under Coburg, so the Coalition was far stronger in horsemen. The 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica sums up the odds as 11 to 10 in favor of the attackers.3

Dumouriez split his army into eight columns. He expected Coburg to be strongest on his right, guarding his supply line, so he aimed the main blow at the Austrian left: Valence on the French right and the Duke of Chartres in the center were to take Oberwinden, the Mittelwinden hill and Neerwinden, while Miranda attacked on the left along the main road. The French crossed the river at seven in the morning. Neerwinden and Oberwinden changed hands several times; Austrian cavalry charges in the open ground between the villages pushed the French back, and by evening Clerfayt held roughly the line he had started from.4

On the French left the decisive fighting came between three and six in the afternoon. Miranda's columns took Dorsmael and lost it to Austrian counterattacks, and after Archduke Charles sent in his cavalry the left wing was driven back across the river toward Tienen. The Britannica article observes that French enthusiasm could hold the villages, but on open ground the veteran Austrian regulars were superior. Finding his center isolated, Dumouriez retreated.5

Losses

John Rickard's account puts the French losses at about 4,000 and the Austrian losses at 2,000. The World History Encyclopedia gives 4,000 French killed and wounded and another 1,000 taken prisoner, and 2,700 Austrians killed and wounded, among them 97 officers.6

Defeat, then defection

The Britannica calls the repulse the signal for the almost complete dissolution of the Revolutionary army. After a further defeat at Louvain, volunteers deserted in droves and Dumouriez's army dwindled to about 20,000 men, according to the World History Encyclopedia. Miranda's supporters accused Dumouriez of sacrificing him with orders that could not be carried out. Dumouriez opened talks with Coburg's staff officer Karl Mack and agreed to evacuate Belgium in return for an unhindered retreat.7

By then he was plotting to march his army on Paris and overthrow the Convention. When commissioners came to his headquarters to summon him, he arrested them and handed them over to the Austrians. His troops refused to follow him, and on 5 April 1793 he crossed to the Austrian lines with the Duke of Chartres, the future King Louis Philippe. The Britannica article sees Neerwinden as the start of the Allied invasion of France. The French recovery that autumn is told in 16 October in military history: Wattignies, 1793.8 › Battle of Wattignies, 1793

Also on this day

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Neerwinden in 1793?

The Austrians, with a small Dutch contingent, under Prince Josias of Saxe-Coburg. They beat off the attacks of Dumouriez's French army, which retreated.

How many soldiers fought at Neerwinden?

Roughly 40,000 on each side, though historians' figures differ. Following Ramsay Weston Phipps, the World History Encyclopedia gives the French about 44,500 men and the Coalition about 40,000.

What were the losses at Neerwinden?

The French lost about 4,000 killed and wounded, plus about 1,000 prisoners by one account, and the Coalition about 2,000 to 2,700, depending on the source.

What happened to Dumouriez after Neerwinden?

He lost Belgium, arrested the commissioners sent from Paris, failed to turn his army against the government and defected to the Austrians on 5 April 1793.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica; World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”. ↩
  2. World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”; Encyclopaedia Britannica. ↩
  3. Note: strengths and losses differ between historians, and the text names the source for e…; World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; Encyclopaedia Britannica. ↩
  4. World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”. ↩
  5. World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”; Encyclopaedia Britannica. ↩
  6. J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”; World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; Note: strengths and losses differ between historians, and the text names the source for e…. ↩
  7. Encyclopaedia Britannica; World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”. ↩
  8. Encyclopaedia Britannica; World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Neerwinden”; J. Rickard, “Battle of Neerwinden, 18 March 1793”; Encyclopaedia Britannica. ↩

Sources

Battle honours of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Relive the great battles

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›