PLJoin the list

Battle of Isandlwana, 1879: the Zulu rout of a British army

Anglo-Zulu War · 1879 · Zulu Kingdom vs British Empire · ~6 min read · Updated September 2026

British infantry making a last stand against Zulu warriors at Isandlwana

At a glance

Zulu KingdomNtshingwayo kaMahole
vs
British EmpirePulleine and Durnford
Date
1879
Location
Isandlwana, Zululand (South Africa)
Period
Anglo-Zulu War
Outcome
Decisive Zulu victory
By the numbers
SideStrengthLosses
Zulu Kingdom~20,000~1,000-3,000 killed (est.)
British and colonial forces~1,800 in camp~1,300 killed

Zulu casualty figures are uncertain and estimates vary.

Balance of forces

Zulu Kingdom~20,000
British and colonial~1,800

Strength engaged at the camp.

Quick answer

The Zulu Kingdom won a decisive victory at Isandlwana on 22 January 18791, when an army of some 20,000 warriors overwhelmed a British camp and killed around 1,300 British and colonial troops2 in a few hours. It was one of the worst defeats a modern industrial army ever suffered against a pre-industrial foe, and it stunned the British Empire.

On 22 January 1879, beneath the sphinx-shaped crag of Isandlwana, a Zulu army of some 20,000 fell on a British camp and destroyed it. Around 1,300 British and colonial troops were killed in a few hours, cut down by warriors armed mostly with spears and cowhide shields. It was one of the worst defeats a modern, industrial army ever suffered at the hands of a pre-industrial foe, and it stunned the British Empire.

An empire invades Zululand

In January 1879 a British column under Lord Chelmsford invaded the independent Zulu kingdom3, confident that modern rifles and artillery would make short work of a spear-armed enemy. The column made camp below the hill of Isandlwana without entrenching it4. Chelmsford then split his force5, marching off with part of it to chase what he thought was the main Zulu army, leaving the camp lightly held.

Oval photographic portrait of a moustached British general in dress uniform with medals
Lieutenant General Lord Chelmsford, who led the British invasion of Zululand in 1879, in a Lock and Whitfield photograph from about 1880. Public domain

The horns of the buffalo

The real Zulu army, around 20,000 strong4, lay hidden nearby. Discovered by a British patrol, it attacked at once in its classic formation: the chest to pin the enemy in front5, the two horns to sweep around each flank, and the loins in reserve. The Zulu regiments crossed the open ground under rifle fire and closed on the thin British firing line.

Black and white sketch map of the Isandlwana camp with arrows marking the Zulu attack
A sketch map of the battle published in 1879, showing the camp below Isandlwana hill, the British positions and the Zulu attack sweeping in around the flanks. Public domain
Rifles and cannon lost to spears, in a few hours, in the open field.

The line is overrun

For a time British firepower held the Zulu back, but the firing line was stretched too thin and too far from the camp4, and, by many accounts, its ammunition ran short at the crucial moment. As the horns curled around the flanks and rear, the line broke into isolated groups. The Zulu overran the camp, and most of the defenders were killed where they stood; only some sixty Europeans, most of them mounted, and a number of African auxiliaries escaped.

Two British officers fighting off Zulu warriors armed with spears and cowhide shields
Lieutenants Melvill and Coghill of the 24th Regiment dying in their attempt to carry the Queen's Colour away from the overrun camp, an 1879 illustration by Charles Edwin Fripp. Public domain

Aftermath and Rorke's Drift

Around 1,300 of the roughly 1,800 men in the camp died.2 The disaster shocked Britain and forced a much larger, more careful campaign that eventually conquered Zululand later in 1879. On the same day, a small garrison famously held the mission station at Rorke's Drift1 against a Zulu detachment, a defensive stand that Britain celebrated to offset the scale of the Isandlwana catastrophe.

Painting of redcoat soldiers fighting by firelight behind barricades at a mission station
The Defence of Rorke's Drift, painted by Lady Butler in 1880 for Queen Victoria, shows the small garrison holding the mission station on the night after Isandlwana. Public domain

Frequently asked questions

When and where was the Battle of Isandlwana?

It was fought on 22 January 1879 at Isandlwana in Zululand, in what is now KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, during the Anglo-Zulu War.

Who won the Battle of Isandlwana?

The Zulu Kingdom won a decisive victory, overwhelming and destroying the British camp. It was one of the worst defeats in British colonial military history.

How did a spear-armed army beat rifles and cannon?

The Zulu attacked in overwhelming numbers using their encircling horns formation, crossed the ground fast, and struck when the over-extended British firing line was short of ammunition and too far from the camp to consolidate.

How many died at Isandlwana?

About 1,300 of the roughly 1,800 British and colonial troops in the camp were killed. Zulu losses are estimated in the low thousands, though figures are uncertain.

What was Rorke's Drift?

Later the same day, a small British garrison defended the mission station at Rorke's Drift against a Zulu force. The successful stand was heavily publicised in Britain to soften the shock of Isandlwana.

Sources and notes

Numbered notes in the text point to the works below.

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battles of Isandlwana and Rorke's Drift” ↩ a b
  2. Ian Knight, Isandlwana 1879: The Great Zulu Victory (Osprey Publishing, 2002). ↩ a b
  3. Donald R. Morris, The Washing of the Spears: The Rise and Fall of the Zulu Nation (Simon and Schuster, 1965). ↩
  4. National Army Museum, “Zulu War” ↩ a b c
  5. World History Encyclopedia, “Battle of Isandlwana: The Zulu Victory over the British Empire” ↩ a b
  6. Wikipedia, “Battle of Isandlwana”

Walk into the ambush

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Join the list to be first when it launches.

Or support the app on Ko-fi ›