PLEnlist

The Battle of Dien Bien Phu, 1954: the siege that ended French Indochina

First Indochina War · 13 March to 7 May 1954 · France vs Viet Minh · ~12 min read · Updated November 2026

Next anniversary: 13 March 2027, the 73rd anniversary of the start 13 March in history ›

A green American-made 105mm howitzer with a long barrel and two large tires stands on a red stone plinth in the rain-wet courtyard of a white colonnaded museum building, with a small information sign in front of it

A 105mm howitzer used at Dien Bien Phu, Vietnam Military History Museum, Hanoi. Photograph by Gary Lee Todd, 2012, via Wikimedia Commons. CC0 (public domain dedication).

At a glance

Viet Minh defeated France and the French Union.

Date
13 March to 7 May 1954 (56 to 57 days)
Location
Dien Bien Phu valley, northwest Vietnam, near the border with Laos
Period
First Indochina War
France and the French UnionGen. Henri Navarre, Christian de Castries (garrison)Defeat
Viet Minh (Vietnam People's Army)Gen. Vo Nguyen GiapVictory

By the numbers

Strength
France and the French Union: About 10,800 men
on the eve of the battle, some 15,000 in all with reinforcements, by the French ministry's count1
Viet Minh (Vietnam People's Army):
Some 35,000 (US Army history) to 40,000 (Britannica) troops around the valley, besides the civilian porters2
Losses
France and the French Union: About 3,000 to 3,500 dead
and missing, and about 10,000 to 11,721 captured, by French official counts3
Viet Minh (Vietnam People's Army): About 8,000 dead
and 15,000 wounded, by French and Vietnamese-based estimates4

The figures differ with the source and with what each one counts: wounded, missing, or men taken prisoner who never came back.

Outcome
Viet Minh victory: the French garrison surrendered
Quick answer

What happened at Dien Bien Phu?

The Battle of Dien Bien Phu was a siege in northwest Vietnam, from 13 March to 7 May 1954, in which General Vo Nguyen Giap's Viet Minh overran a French air-supplied fortress near Laos. Guns dug into the hills closed its airstrip, Washington declined to intervene, and the fall led to the Geneva accords and the partition of Vietnam.5

In the spring of 1954 a valley in northwest Vietnam decided the fate of an empire. At Dien Bien Phu a French garrison held an airstrip ringed by hills, and on those hills General Vo Nguyen Giap's army placed guns the French believed it could never bring there. The 56-day siege ended French rule in Indochina, divided Vietnam at Geneva and set the United States on the road to the Vietnam War.6

Why did the French go to Dien Bien Phu?

Dien Bien Phu lies in a broad valley in the mountains of northwest Vietnam, close to the border with Laos. Giap described it as a plain about 18 kilometers long and six to eight wide, the largest in that hill country, where roads met from Lai Chau, Son La and the Laotian royal capital of Luang Prabang.7

Dark locator map with a gold star in a glowing circle marking the approximate site of The Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the coasts, rivers and lakes of the region, and a small world map inset with the area boxed
The Battle of Dien Bien Phu: the star marks the approximate site, and the inset shows the area on a world map. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

France had been at war with the Viet Minh, Ho Chi Minh's communist-led independence movement, since late 1946, and by 1953 the war was a deadlock that French finances could barely bear. That year the government sent a new commander in chief, General Henri Navarre, with a plan to destroy the enemy's main battle force and hand the war to the national armies of the Associated States. By 1954 the United States was paying about 80 percent of the war's cost.8

The Viet Minh had a strategy of their own. In late 1953 they moved to take the Tai country of the northwest and threatened Laos, which France had undertaken to defend. Navarre's answer was Operation Castor. On 20 November 1953 French paratroopers dropped into the valley, about 2,650 of them by the French ministry's count and some 3,000 by the US Army's, and by nightfall they held it. The base was meant to disrupt the Viet Minh offensive and bar the way into Laos.9

Even the French disagreed on its purpose. Navarre presented it as the shield of northern Laos. General René Cogny, commanding in Tonkin, saw a base for Tai partisans. Some officers spoke of bait, to draw the Viet Minh into a costly attack like the one that had failed against the air-supplied camp at Na San in November 1952. The French ministry's historians call the choice of site coherent and deny that either side walked into a trap. Our ranking of military blunders sets out the warnings Navarre overrode.10

Color map of Indochina on a cream background with dark red areas held by the Viet Minh in northern Vietnam and along the coast, lighter pink areas under Viet Minh attack in Laos, Cambodia and the south, and blue squares marking French garrison posts, with a legend box at the lower left
Indochina on 29 May 1951, in a map by the Central Intelligence Agency: dark red marks the areas held by the Viet Minh, pink the areas under constant Viet Minh attack, and blue squares the French garrison posts. Dien Bien Phu is not marked. It lies south of Lai Chau and west of Son La, near the Laotian border. Public domain (US government work). Central Intelligence Agency, 1951, published by the CIA, via Wikimedia Commons.

The fortress in the valley

Through the winter the garrison dug in around the airstrip. Its positions, grouped in three sub-sectors, were given women's names, among them Béatrice, Gabrielle, Anne-Marie, Dominique and Éliane. Giap counted 49 strongpoints, each able to defend itself, grouped behind trenches and barbed wire hundreds of meters deep. The defenders, by Giap's description chiefly Europeans and Africans with crack paratroop units, came from metropolitan France and across the French Union, many of them recruited in Indochina itself.11

The garrison numbered about 10,800 men on the eve of the battle, according to the French ministry, which puts the total who fought there, with reinforcements, at about 15,000. Giap's own count was 16,200 men, with three artillery battalions, a company of tanks and a squadron of aircraft. Everything they used arrived by air.12

Giap's preparation: guns on the hills

For Giap, the French garrison in the valley was the chance of the war. A plan he sent to the Politburo on 6 December 1953 expected the battle to last about 45 days and to need three infantry divisions and all of the army's artillery, engineers and anti-aircraft troops, some 42,000 people in all. The attack was set for 26 January 1954, under a plan called "swift attack, swift victory."13

That morning Giap called it off. The French were no longer improvising a camp but had built a fortress, and his guns, exposed in their positions, would be easy targets. "If we attack, failure will be inevitable," he recalled telling the head of the foreign military advisers. He ordered the heavy guns hauled back and changed the plan to "steady attack, steady advance." In the account of the Chinese historian Xiaobing Li, the Chinese advisers had wanted an immediate attack. His own account of that morning is titled "The Most Difficult Decision."14

Then the guns went back in, this time into casemates dug into the hills. Where roads could not be built, Giap wrote, artillery pieces were moved "by nothing but the sweat and muscle of our soldiers." By February, by the US Army's count, close to 35,000 Viet Minh troops held the high ground, with about a hundred 105mm and 75mm guns and another hundred heavy mortars and recoilless rifles trained on the strongpoints below. The 105mm howitzers were American-made, captured by the Chinese in Korea.15

China made the siege possible. After the Korean armistice of July 1953 Beijing sent the heavy artillery and anti-aircraft guns the Viet Minh had lacked at Na San, and a Chinese military mission under General Wei Guoqing worked beside Giap's command post. Li puts China's aid to the campaign at 2.4 million rounds of ammunition, 60,000 artillery shells, 100 heavy guns and 1.87 million kilograms of grain. Chinese trucks, a thousand of them by French intelligence reports, kept the shells coming.16

Much of the rest moved on human backs. Giap remembered the long lines of carriers, people from the delta bearing loads on squeaking shoulder poles, and bicycle convoys that "looked like a herd of little elephants." Asselin, from Vietnamese figures, counts 33,500 civilian laborers with 2,724 modified bicycles who carried 20,584 tons of rice to the front. French staff estimates had not expected an army to be supplied so deep in the mountains.17

13 March: the fall of Beatrice and Gabrielle

At 5:10 in the afternoon of 13 March 1954, by the French ministry's timing, the Viet Minh guns opened fire across the whole camp. The Vietnamese defense journal gives 5 p.m. The infantry went in against Béatrice, the position the Vietnamese call Him Lam, and it fell that night.18

Gabrielle, Doc Lap to the Vietnamese, came next. On the night of 14 to 15 March two regiments attacked the position and its battalion of Algerian riflemen, and by the next morning it had fallen. Anne-Marie, at Ban Keo, was lost within days, and by 17 March the northern gate of the camp was gone.19

The victories were costly. Asselin estimates that between 13 and 16 March the Viet Minh suffered more than 9,000 casualties, 2,000 of them dead, in massed infantry assaults he links to Chinese advice. Afterward Giap relied less on human waves and more on digging.20

Piroth and the airstrip

The shock inside the camp was the Viet Minh artillery. Colonel Charles Piroth, the garrison's artillery commander, had been sure that Giap could not move heavy guns over the mountain ridges around the valley or keep them supplied, and he had promised to silence any that opened fire. He failed. In the first days of the battle he killed himself in his bunker, reportedly in despair. The historians Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier write that he withdrew to the bunker after a dressing-down from Pierre Langlais, one of the camp's senior officers, on the morning of 15 March. A Vietnamese defense journal, which says he used a grenade, dates his death to 16 March.21

Giap's plan aimed from the start at the camp's weakness, which he saw in its supply, "which depended entirely on his air forces." On 14 March the Viet Minh guns closed the main airstrip and destroyed seven Bearcat fighters, two C-47s, a C-119, four light aircraft and two helicopters on the ground. For about two weeks small planes slipped in at night to fly out the wounded, until an air ambulance was destroyed on the strip. Giap counted the threat to the main airfield among the gains of the first phase.22

From then on the garrison lived on parachutes. The camp needed some 170 tons of ammunition and 32 tons of food dropped each day. Anti-aircraft fire forced the transports to drop from 8,000 to 10,000 feet, and between half and two thirds of the cargo fell into Viet Minh hands, according to the US Air Force history.23

The siege: the battle of the five hills

On 30 March Giap opened the second phase against the hills east of the airstrip, the Dominique and Éliane positions that guarded the heart of the camp. The French called it the battle of the five hills. Hills were taken and retaken. The hardest fight of all was for Éliane 2, the hill the Vietnamese call A1.24

Between assaults the Viet Minh dug. A network of trenches, "hundreds of kilometres" of them in Giap's words, ran from the high mountains down to the plains, cut the central sector off from the southern one and brought the airstrip under fire from every side. General Yves Gras later likened the method to a spider catching insects in its web.25

Operation Vulture: why didn't the United States intervene?

In Washington the siege became a crisis. General Paul Ely, chief of the French armed forces staff, arrived in Washington on 20 March and met Eisenhower, Dulles and Radford. According to the US Air Force history, Admiral Arthur Radford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke of a strike by sixty B-29 bombers escorted by 150 carrier aircraft against the Viet Minh around the camp, and Ely went home believing that American help would follow. The French called the plan Vautour, or Vulture.26

Black and white portrait of a gaunt man with deep lines in his face, wearing a bowler hat, a herringbone overcoat and a striped tie, with the tail of an airliner behind him
General Paul Ely, the French chief of staff who flew to Washington in March 1954 to ask for American help, photographed in 1958. CC0. Anefo photograph, Nationaal Archief, The Hague, via Wikimedia Commons.

Not everyone agreed. General Matthew Ridgway, the Army chief of staff, answered "an emphatic No," warning of a general war, and the other service chiefs also advised against it. On 3 April Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Radford briefed eight congressional leaders. The feeling was unanimous, Dulles recorded: "we want no more Koreas with the United States furnishing 90% of the manpower." There would be no resolution until he had commitments from allies.27

Late on 4 April Premier Joseph Laniel and Foreign Minister Georges Bidault told the American ambassador, Douglas Dillon, that "immediate armed intervention of US carrier aircraft at Dien Bien Phu is now necessary to save the situation." China, they argued, had already intervened, with technical advisers at Giap's headquarters, forty radar-controlled 37mm anti-aircraft guns and a thousand supply trucks. Eisenhower refused: to act without Congress, his notes of a call with Dulles record, would be "completely unconstitutional & indefensible." Britain would not join, and on 25 April Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden made clear that London opposed American air intervention.28

Short of combat, American help was considerable. The carrier Saipan brought 25 Corsair fighter-bombers to Tourane, and US Air Force C-124s flew French reinforcements from Europe and North Africa. In April Brigadier General Joseph Caldara flew over the camp to study a bombing raid and found "no true B-29 targets." Eisenhower told the National Security Council that the United States would not act on Dien Bien Phu "in and by itself," only as part of a coalition for Southeast Asia.29

Black and white photograph of a French naval officer in a white cap shaking hands with an American pilot in flight gear on a steel-mat airfield, with other pilots smiling around them and the folded wings and propellers of Corsair fighters behind
At Tourane (Da Nang) on 18 April 1954, French naval aviator C. A. Libiot greets Second Lieutenant John F. Schrepferman of US Marine Attack Squadron 324, whose pilots had just delivered Corsair fighter-bombers to the French in the middle of the siege. Public domain (US Navy photograph). Naval History and Heritage Command, NH 84051, via Wikimedia Commons.

The fall on 7 May

Giap's third phase opened at 5 p.m. on 1 May against the last eastern hills. Navarre dropped small numbers of paratroopers into the camp on the nights of 3, 4 and 5 May, but there were not enough aircraft to send more.30

The final assault began on the night of 6 May. At 5:30 p.m. on 7 May Viet Minh soldiers took the command bunker and captured Christian de Castries, by then a general, with his whole staff. Their banner, "Determination to fight, determination to win," was raised over it. That night the garrison of Isabelle, the southern strongpoint, tried to break out, and by Giap's account more than 2,000 men were captured there.31

The fall came less than a day before the Geneva conference turned to Indochina, on 8 May.32

How many died at Dien Bien Phu?

The casualty figures differ widely. A 2024 publication of the French armed forces ministry gives about 3,500 French Union dead and missing and 10,300 prisoners, and the same issue speaks elsewhere of 3,000 killed and nearly 12,000 men taken into captivity. A question put in the French National Assembly in 2023 cited 2,293 killed, 1,600 missing and 11,721 captured.33

For the prisoners the battle's end was the start of an ordeal. Of about 10,000 who went into the camps, only some 3,300 came back in September, according to the historian Hugues Tertrais, and the 2023 question put the figure at 3,290 of 11,721. Some died on the march, others in the camps.34

Viet Minh losses were also heavy: about 8,000 dead and 15,000 wounded by the French ministry's estimate, and 7,900 dead and more than 15,000 wounded in Asselin's figures. Giap's own reckoning was of the enemy: 16,200 men "put out of action," among them a general, 16 colonels and 1,749 officers and warrant officers, and 62 aircraft shot down or destroyed.35

Black and white photograph of a large four-engined transport aircraft marked Troop Carrier United States Air Force standing on an airfield under a cloudy sky, with a smaller twin-engined bomber parked in the background
A US Air Force C-124 Globemaster II at Tan Son Nhut airport, Saigon, on 13 May 1954, which the Naval History and Heritage Command records as bringing the first French paratroopers from North Africa, six days after Dien Bien Phu fell. Public domain (US Navy photograph). Naval History and Heritage Command, NH 74152, via Wikimedia Commons.

Who won, and what did Dien Bien Phu change?

The Viet Minh won outright. In Vietnam the victory is remembered as one that "resounded across the five continents and shook the globe." For the French Union, in Tertrais's words, it marked the beginning of the end, and across the colonized world its name became a byword for the weak defeating the strong. It ranks among the greatest sieges in history and in our list of the greatest battles of France.36

At Geneva the French and the Viet Minh agreed to a ceasefire, signed on 21 July 1954, and to a temporary division of Vietnam at the 17th parallel. A second agreement called for elections in 1956. The United States did not sign it and backed a separate government in the South under Ngo Dinh Diem.37

For France the defeat hastened the end of an empire: the Algerian insurrection broke out six months later, and the army's humiliation contributed to the fall of the Fourth Republic in 1958 (see our military history of France). The United States, fearing that Southeast Asia would fall like dominoes, stayed for another twenty years, as the military history of the United States tells. In 1968 the siege of Khe Sanh would be measured against Dien Bien Phu.38

Why did the French lose? The US Army's history blames the French, and the Americans who accepted their estimates. Asselin points to Chinese artillery and Vietnamese logistics, and Giap credited trenches, guns and a mobilized people. Each comes back to a fortress that lived by its airstrip, under hills its defenders could not hold.39

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Dien Bien Phu?

The Viet Minh under General Vo Nguyen Giap won outright. After 56 days of siege they overran the French camp on 7 May 1954 and captured its commander, Christian de Castries, with his whole staff and the surviving garrison. The defeat led France to accept a settlement at Geneva that summer.

Why did the French lose at Dien Bien Phu?

The camp depended on its airstrip, and Viet Minh artillery dug into the surrounding hills closed it within days. Armed with Chinese guns and supplied by tens of thousands of porters, Giap's army outgunned and outlasted a garrison that could only be reinforced and supplied by parachute.

How many died at Dien Bien Phu?

Figures vary. French official texts give about 3,000 to 3,500 French Union dead and missing and 10,000 to nearly 12,000 prisoners, most of whom never came back from the camps. Viet Minh losses are estimated at about 8,000 dead and 15,000 wounded.

Where is Dien Bien Phu?

Dien Bien Phu (Điện Biên Phủ) lies in a mountain valley in northwest Vietnam, close to the border with Laos, about 17 to 18 kilometers long and 6 to 8 kilometers wide. Today the valley has a museum of the battle, and de Castries's command bunker can still be visited.

What was Operation Vulture?

Vautour, or Vulture, was a proposed American air strike to relieve Dien Bien Phu in April 1954, discussed by Admiral Radford and General Ely, with B-29 bombers and carrier aircraft. President Eisenhower would not act without Congress and allies, Britain declined, and the strike never took place.

Why did the French choose Dien Bien Phu?

General Navarre wanted an air-supplied base in the northwest to disrupt the Viet Minh offensive in the Tai country and bar the way into Laos. The valley was the only ground in the region large enough for one, and some officers hoped to repeat the defensive success of Na San.

What happened after Dien Bien Phu?

The Geneva conference took up Indochina the next day. In July a ceasefire divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel, with elections promised for 1956. France left, the United States backed a separate government in the South, and the road led on to the Vietnam War.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note. Each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. ↩
  2. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  3. Frédéric Daumas and the editors, “70e anniversaire de la bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Assemblée nationale, written question no. 6662 by Frank Giletti, “Soldats français morts à Diên Bien Phu dont les corps sont restés sur place”, and the government’s answer. ↩
  4. Frédéric Daumas and the editors, “70e anniversaire de la bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  5. Office of the Historian, “Dien Bien Phu and the Fall of French Indochina, 1954”. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  6. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. Office of the Historian, “Dien Bien Phu and the Fall of French Indochina, 1954”. ↩
  7. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  8. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  9. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  10. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Alec Holcombe, review of Xiaobing Li, Building Ho’s Army. ↩
  11. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. ↩
  12. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. ↩
  13. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  14. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. Alec Holcombe, review of Xiaobing Li, Building Ho’s Army. ↩
  15. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. ↩
  16. Alec Holcombe, review of Xiaobing Li, Building Ho’s Army. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. ↩
  17. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier, Valley of the Shadow. ↩
  18. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. John D. Plating, Failure in the Margins. ↩
  19. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. John D. Plating, Failure in the Margins. Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier, Valley of the Shadow. ↩
  20. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  21. Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier, Valley of the Shadow. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. John D. Plating, Failure in the Margins. ↩
  22. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. ↩
  23. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. John D. Plating, Failure in the Margins. ↩
  24. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier, Valley of the Shadow. ↩
  25. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. ↩
  26. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. ↩
  27. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. ↩
  28. US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952-1954. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. Office of the Historian, “Dien Bien Phu and the Fall of French Indochina, 1954”. ↩
  29. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. Naval History and Heritage Command, photograph NH 84051, VMA-324 pilots deliver AU-1 Corsairs to the French at Tourane, 18 April 1954. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. ↩
  30. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. John D. Plating, Failure in the Margins. ↩
  31. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. Kevin Boylan and Luc Olivier, Valley of the Shadow. ↩
  32. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. ↩
  33. Frédéric Daumas and the editors, “70e anniversaire de la bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Ministère des Armées, “La bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Assemblée nationale, written question no. 6662 by Frank Giletti, “Soldats français morts à Diên Bien Phu dont les corps sont restés sur place”, and the government’s answer. ↩
  34. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. Assemblée nationale, written question no. 6662 by Frank Giletti, “Soldats français morts à Diên Bien Phu dont les corps sont restés sur place”, and the government’s answer. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. ↩
  35. Frédéric Daumas and the editors, “70e anniversaire de la bataille de Diên Biên Phu”. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. Vo Nguyen Giap, People’s War, People’s Army. ↩
  36. National Defence Journal, “French generals’ admission of defeat in Dien Bien Phu”. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. ↩
  37. Office of the Historian, “Dien Bien Phu and the Fall of French Indochina, 1954”. Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau, “Dien Bien Phu, Battle of”. ↩
  38. Hugues Tertrais, “1954, la fin de l’Indochine française”. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Battle of Dien Bien Phu”. Office of the Historian, “Dien Bien Phu and the Fall of French Indochina, 1954”. Moyers S. Shore II, The Battle for Khe Sanh. ↩
  39. Ronald H. Spector, Advice and Support. Pierre Asselin, “New Perspectives on Dien Bien Phu”. Vo Nguyen Giap, Dien Bien Phu. ↩

Sources

Battle honors of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Hold the valley at Dien Bien Phu

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.