PLEnlist

Battle of Imphal, 1944: where Japan's march on India broke

Second World War · 1944 · British Empire vs Japan · ~8 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 8 March 2027, the 83rd anniversary of the start On this day ›

Black and white photograph of infantry advancing across open grassland behind a Lee tank and a carrier, with smoke rising in front of steep wooded hills

No. 9 Army Film and Photographic Unit, IWM IND 3469, 1944, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain (UK Crown copyright expired).

At a glance

British Empire (British Indian Army)Lt-Gen Geoffry Scoones, William Slim
vs
Empire of Japan (with the Indian National Army)Lt-Gen Renya Mutaguchi
Date
8 March to July 1944 (siege lifted 22 June)
Location
Imphal plain and surrounding hills, Manipur, north-east India
War
Second World War, Burma campaign (Japanese Operation U-Go)
Commanders
British Empire: Scoones (IV Corps), Slim (Fourteenth Army). Japan: Mutaguchi (Fifteenth Army); INA 1st Division
Strength
Around Imphal, by H. S. Katoch's count: IV Corps over 120,000; Japanese about 70,000 plus over 6,000 INA. Whole Japanese Fifteenth Army about 85,000
Casualties
British and Indian about 12,500 to 17,500 casualties; Japanese more than 50,000 dead and missing for U-Go including Kohima
Outcome
Decisive British and Indian victory; Japanese invasion of India abandoned
By the numbers
SideStrengthLosses
British Empire (IV Corps)over 120,000, most of them Indian~12,500 to ~17,500 casualties
Empire of Japan and INA~70,000 Japanese around Imphal + ~6,000 INA (85,000 in the Fifteenth Army)~53,000 to ~54,000 dead, missing or wounded for the whole offensive; over 30,000 dead

All figures are estimates and most Japanese totals cover Imphal and Kohima together. The National Army Museum gives 53,000 Japanese dead and missing; the Japanese archive JACAR over 30,000 killed plus over 20,000 dead of illness and starvation; the Nippon Foundation a higher toll still.

Balance of forces

IV Corps~120,000
Japanese and INA~76,000

Figures for the Imphal sector only, after H. S. Katoch; the Japanese Fifteenth Army as a whole had about 85,000 men.

Quick answer

Who won the Battle of Imphal?

The British Empire won. IV Corps under Lieutenant-General Geoffry Scoones, mostly Indian troops of Slim's Fourteenth Army, held the Imphal plain from March to July 1944 with supplies flown in. Mutaguchi's Fifteenth Army and its Indian National Army allies were broken by battle, hunger and disease.1

From March to July 1944 the hills around Imphal, capital of Manipur in north-east India, saw some of the hardest fighting of the Second World War. The Japanese Fifteenth Army of Lieutenant-General Renya Mutaguchi, with the Indian National Army (INA), tried to take the Allied base on the Imphal plain; IV Corps under Lieutenant-General Geoffry Scoones held until hunger, disease and the monsoon broke the attackers. The twin battle to the north is told in the Battle of Kohima.2

Part of Battles of India · Before: Saragarhi, 1897 · Next: Kohima, 1944

Background: Burma lost, Slim's new army

Japan overran Burma in 1942, and the beaten British and Indian army fell back into India through Manipur. Imphal became a forward base of airfields, depots and new roads, and Slim rebuilt the Fourteenth Army around jungle training and defensive "boxes" that aircraft could keep supplied when surrounded. The method was proven when a diversionary Japanese attack in the Arakan was beaten at the Admin Box.3

Dark locator map with a gold star in a glowing circle marking the approximate center of the fighting of Battle of Imphal, the coasts, rivers and lakes of the region, and a small world map inset with the area boxed
Battle of Imphal: the star marks the approximate center of the fighting, and the inset shows the area on a world map. Drawn for this article from Natural Earth data, with no modern borders. Location map: © Echoes of Battle (data: Natural Earth, public domain)

Mutaguchi's plan and the road to Delhi

Operation U-Go began on 8 March 1944. It aimed to seize the Imphal supply bases and cut the Dimapur road at Kohima; the Japanese archive JACAR adds cutting the Allied supply route to China and stirring anti-British movements in India. For Subhas Chandra Bose's INA, as the historian Peter Ward Fay put it, breaking into India was its reason for existing; Shashi Tharoor recalls Bose's battle cry "Chalo Dilli", on to Delhi.4

A 2024 study by Shinpuku Yuichi of Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies traces the offensive to a 1942 plan, Operation 21, that Mutaguchi had then opposed, and points to his ambition and his regret at that caution. The gamble was logistical: the divisions crossed the Chindwin and the mountains on a thin supply line and counted on capturing British stores before their own ran out.5

The armies

IV Corps had the 17th, 20th and 23rd Indian Divisions plus parachute and tank brigades, later reinforced by air with the 5th Indian Division. The Indian researcher Hemant Singh Katoch counts over 120,000 men; a British National Archives study gives 340,000 Indian, 100,000 British and 90,000 African troops in north-east India. The Japanese 15th and 33rd Divisions struck at Imphal while the 31st marched on Kohima: about 70,000 men plus over 6,000 INA by Katoch's count, out of some 85,000 in the Fifteenth Army.6

March: withdrawal and the stand at Sangshak

Slim and Scoones pulled their forward divisions back to the edge of the plain: the 17th Indian Division fought its way up the Tiddim road against the Japanese 33rd Division, and the 20th fell back from Tamu to the Shenam Saddle.7

North-east of Imphal, at the hill village of Sangshak, the newly arrived 50th Indian Parachute Brigade held off battalions of the Japanese 58th Regiment from 22 to 26 March before breaking out. The historian Robert Lyman writes that one Gurkha parachute battalion lost about 80 percent of its men, but the Japanese advance on Kohima lost about a week. On 29 March the Japanese cut the road to Kohima.8

Coloured campaign map of Burma and north-east India with insets for the Myitkyina, Imphal and Arakan areas, red Japanese attack arrows towards Imphal and Kohima and a Japanese order of battle for April 1944
Map 41 of the West Point atlas of the Second World War, prepared by the Department of History of the US Military Academy: the opening of the third Burma campaign, November 1943 to May 1944. The center inset shows the Japanese thrusts on Imphal and Kohima in March and April 1944, with the IV Corps perimeter around Imphal; the lower inset shows the Japanese attack in the Arakan in February. Public domain (US government work). Department of History, US Military Academy, via Wikimedia Commons.

April to June: the spokes of the wheel

The Japanese then attacked on every road into the plain. In the north they took the Nungshigum massif, until tanks, aircraft and Indian infantry retook it in mid-April, Katoch writes. On the Tamu to Palel road the Yamamoto Force, with INA brigades on its flanks, struck the Shenam Saddle for months; hills nicknamed Nippon Hill and Scraggy changed hands again and again.9

A soldier with a pack walks across a shell torn hilltop of mud, caved in bunkers and leafless shattered trees, with other soldiers standing in drifting smoke
Scraggy Hill on the Shenam Saddle after its capture by the 10th Gurkha Rifles: caved-in Japanese bunkers, debris and trees stripped bare by shellfire. Photograph by No. 9 Army Film and Photographic Unit, 1944, Imperial War Museums (IND 3714). The Japanese called this hill Ito. Public domain (Crown copyright expired)

In the south-west the 33rd Division drove up the Tiddim road towards Bishenpur, scene of some of the heaviest fighting of the campaign in Slim's judgment, and in late May, by Katoch's account, reached Red Hill, its closest point to Imphal from the south. Five Victoria Crosses were won at Imphal, among them Jemadar Abdul Hafiz, the first Muslim to receive it in the Second World War.10

Supplied from the sky

Cut off by land, IV Corps lived by air. The National Army Museum counts nearly 19,000 tons of supplies and over 12,000 men flown in and about 13,000 casualties flown out; Lyman, quoted by Katoch, counts up to 404 aircraft at the height of the airlift.11

Soldiers push a muddy jeep up wooden ramps into the open cargo door of a twin engine transport aircraft marked KG459, while airmen and other troops watch from the grass
Troops of the 5th Indian Division load a jeep into a Douglas Dakota of No. 194 Squadron RAF during the reinforcement of the Imphal garrison in 1944. Photograph by an official RAF photographer, Imperial War Museums (CF 145). Reinforcements, vehicles and supplies reached the besieged garrison this way. Public domain (Crown copyright expired)

Why did the Japanese lose the Battle of Imphal?

The Japanese lost because their plan depended on capturing British supplies quickly, and the defenders refused to break. Air supply kept IV Corps fed, armed and reinforced, while Japanese units at the end of a long mountain supply line ran out of food and ammunition. When the monsoon came, hunger and disease finished what battle began.

Hunger, monsoon and retreat

Mutaguchi kept attacking long after the offensive had failed, and his men starved in the monsoon rains. On 22 June troops from Kohima and Imphal met at Milestone 109, reopening the road. Katoch dates the end of the last Japanese stand in Manipur, at Ukhrul, to 8 July and the start of the INA withdrawal to 18 July. Mutaguchi, the National Army Museum notes, was relieved and forced to retire in December 1944, while Slim, Scoones and Stopford were knighted at Imphal.12

How many died at Imphal?

Most Japanese totals cover the whole offensive, Kohima included. The National Army Museum gives 53,000 dead and missing out of about 85,000; a British diplomat in 2014 cited nearly 54,000 casualties. Japan's historical records center counts over 30,000 killed and over 20,000 dead of illness and starvation, and the Nippon Foundation a still higher toll. Katoch calls it Japan's greatest defeat on land; the museum, one of the biggest its army ever suffered. British and Indian losses at Imphal are given as 12,500 casualties or 17,500 killed and wounded.13

The British and Indian side

For Slim's army Imphal proved that Japanese troops could be beaten in the jungle. Its soldiers were Indian, Gurkha, African and British, and Indians were the majority. In April 2013 Imphal and Kohima together were voted Britain's greatest battle in a National Army Museum contest, yet Katoch argues the battle long received little attention in India itself.14

A general in a slouch hat and long light raincoat leans on the canvas roof of a mud spattered jeep and talks with a helmeted Gurkha rifleman sitting inside with his rifle
Lieutenant-General William Slim, commander of the Fourteenth Army, talks with a Gurkha soldier in a jeep. Slim's army was drawn mostly from the Indian subcontinent. Public domain

The Japanese side

Japanese soldiers fought on long after they had any chance. Of the starving 33rd Division's last attacks, Slim wrote, as Katoch quotes him: "I know of no army that could have equalled them." In Japan the operation is remembered as a failure of command: Shinpuku notes it is a byword for a reckless operation, still criticized today, and the Nippon Foundation speaks of a "reckless operation". The Japanese government built the India Peace Memorial at Red Hill, inaugurated in 1994 according to Katoch.15

The INA: collaborators or freedom fighters?

Imphal had Indian soldiers on both sides. To the British authorities INA men who fought beside Japan were traitors: in November 1945, as Shashi Tharoor recounts, three officers were tried at the Red Fort for waging war against the King-Emperor. One was Shah Nawaz Khan, who had led INA battalions in the Imphal campaign. Tharoor describes a national outcry, with crowds hailing them as patriots, not traitors. Some Indians, the National Archives study notes, saw cooperation with Japan as a faster road to self-rule, and some Manipuris joined the INA. An INA Memorial Complex now stands at Moirang, where Katoch records the INA flag was raised on 14 April 1944.16

Manipur's war

For Manipur the battle was the "Japan war". Japanese bombs destroyed homes and markets, Allied scorched earth measures razed whole villages, and many families were displaced. In April 1944 the Political Agent in Manipur warned that people who saw British forces destroy their homes and food could hardly remain "enthusiastically pro-British".17

The battlefield today

Imphal War Cemetery holds about 1,600 Commonwealth graves, and a second cemetery and a cremation memorial honor Indian Army dead. On 22 June 2019 the Imphal Peace Museum, supported by Japan's Nippon Foundation, opened at Red Hill before Indian, Japanese and British guests. See also the greatest battles of the Second World War and the greatest battles in Indian history.18

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Battle of Imphal?

The British Empire. IV Corps, mostly Indian troops under Geoffry Scoones within Slim's Fourteenth Army, defeated the Japanese Fifteenth Army and its INA allies between March and July 1944.

How many died at the Battle of Imphal?

Figures differ and usually include Kohima: about 53,000 Japanese dead and missing according to the National Army Museum, and about 12,500 to 17,500 British and Indian killed and wounded at Imphal.

Why did the Japanese lose at Imphal?

Their plan relied on capturing British supplies. The defenders were supplied by air, while the Japanese starved at the end of a long mountain supply line and were then struck by the monsoon and disease.

Where was the Battle of Imphal fought?

In Manipur, north-east India, on the hills and roads around the Imphal plain, from Bishenpur and the Shenam Saddle to Nungshigum and Sangshak.

Did the Indian National Army fight at Imphal?

Yes. Several thousand men of the INA's 1st Division fought beside the Japanese, mainly around the Shenam Saddle and Ukhrul, and withdrew with them in July 1944.

What happened after the Battle of Imphal?

The Fourteenth Army pursued the Japanese into Burma and took Meiktila and Mandalay in March 1945; Rangoon fell in May 1945.

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, “Battle of Imphal (8 March 1944)”. ↩
  2. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; GOV.UK, “The Battle of Imphal 70th anniversary commemorations”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  3. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The National Archives, “Home front India”. ↩
  4. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, “Battle of Imphal (8 March 1944)”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; Shashi Tharoor, “The Trial That Led Toward Independence”. ↩
  5. National Institute for Defense Studies, “Imphal sakusen kara 80 shunen (NIDS Commentary No. 304)”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, “Battle of Imphal (8 March 1944)”. ↩
  6. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The National Archives, “Home front India”; The Nippon Foundation, “Passing On the Memory of a Reckless Operation to Future Generations”. ↩
  7. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  8. Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The War Room, “Sangshak”; National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”. ↩
  9. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  10. Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; GOV.UK, “The Battle of Imphal 70th anniversary commemorations”. ↩
  11. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  12. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The War Room, “Sangshak”. ↩
  13. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; GOV.UK, “The Battle of Imphal 70th anniversary commemorations”; Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, “Battle of Imphal (8 March 1944)”; The Nippon Foundation, “Passing On the Memory of a Reckless Operation to Future Generations”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  14. Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The National Archives, “Home front India”. ↩
  15. Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; National Institute for Defense Studies, “Imphal sakusen kara 80 shunen (NIDS Commentary No. 304)”; The Nippon Foundation, “Passing On the Memory of a Reckless Operation to Future Generations”. ↩
  16. Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; Shashi Tharoor, “The Trial That Led Toward Independence”; The National Archives, “Home front India”. ↩
  17. The National Archives, “Home front India”; The Nippon Foundation, “Passing On the Memory of a Reckless Operation to Future Generations”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”. ↩
  18. National Army Museum, “Battles of Imphal and Kohima”; Journal of Defence Studies, “The Battle of Imphal”; The Nippon Foundation, “Passing On the Memory of a Reckless Operation to Future Generations”; Eastern Mirror, “Museum for peace opened in memory of World War II at Imphal”. ↩

Sources

Battle honours of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Hold the plain with IV Corps

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.