What was the Upper Silesia plebiscite of 1921?
It was the vote of 20 March 1921, held under the Treaty of Versailles, on whether Upper Silesia should stay German or join Poland. Germany won about 60 percent of the votes, but most of the rural population voted Polish. In October 1921 the League of Nations divided the region, and Poland received its industrial core.1
On 20 March 1921, about 1.2 million people in part of German Upper Silesia went to the polls under the eyes of Allied troops. They were asked one question: Germany or Poland. The answer was a German majority overall and a Polish majority in hundreds of villages, and that double answer led to a third armed rising, a decision by the League of Nations and a border that cut through the middle of one of Europe's great coal and steel districts. The plebiscite belongs to the wider story of Polish independence and its border wars, 1914 to 1921.2
Why was there a plebiscite in Upper Silesia?
The draft peace terms handed to the German delegation on 7 May 1919 gave Upper Silesia to Poland outright. Germany protested, and the Allies changed the treaty: since Germany denied that separation matched the wishes of the population, they agreed to let the inhabitants decide. The historian Maciej Fic of the University of Silesia attributes the change above all to the British prime minister, David Lloyd George, and dates the decision of the Supreme Council of the Peace Conference to 4 June 1919.3

Article 88 of the Treaty of Versailles, signed on 28 June 1919, laid down that the inhabitants of a defined part of Upper Silesia would be called on to show by a vote whether they wished to be attached to Germany or to Poland. German troops and senior officials were to leave within fifteen days, and an international commission backed by Allied troops would take over. The result was to be counted by communes, and the commission would then recommend a frontier, paying regard to the wishes of the inhabitants and to the geographical and economic conditions of each locality.4
The Inter-Allied Commission in Opole
The commission took over the plebiscite area by a proclamation issued at Opole (Oppeln) on 11 February 1920. The treaty had foreseen four members, but the United States never named one, so it was made up of France, the British Empire and Italy. Its chairman was the French general Henri Le Rond.5
French and Italian troops arrived with the commission, and British troops only in 1921. German civil authorities and the army left, but lower officials, judges, teachers and the police stayed in place under Allied authority. Poles resented above all the German security police, the Sicherheitspolizei (Sipo), which in their view favored the German population.6

The plebiscite area and its people
The plebiscite area covered about 11,000 square kilometers, by Fic's count, and was home to more than 2 million people according to the census of 1910. George Finch, writing in the American Journal of International Law in 1922, gave about 4,100 square miles and 2,060,000 inhabitants in 1919. It ran from Opole and Racibórz (Ratibor) in the west to the industrial towns of Gliwice (Gleiwitz), Bytom (Beuthen) and Katowice (Kattowitz) in the east, where the region's coal, zinc and iron industry lay.7
Its people did not divide neatly into two nations. Many were bilingual, and before 1914, Maren Hachmeister writes following Juliane Haubold-Stolle, languages and cultures had lived side by side there with little regard to national labels. The American historian Brendan Karch argues that most Upper Silesians took an instrumental stance toward nationalism, putting family, village, work and religion before national belonging. T. Hunt Tooley called the German win "in the face of an actual majority of 'ethnic' Poles" a drama in itself.8
Two campaigns: Korfanty in Bytom, Urbanek in Katowice
The Polish campaign was run by the Polish Plebiscite Commissariat, set up in February 1920 in the Hotel Lomnitz in Bytom (Beuthen) and led by the plebiscite commissioner Wojciech Korfanty, a former member of the Reichstag. The IPN historian Aleksandra Korol-Chudy calls it the main and only organizer and center of Polish propaganda.9
Its German counterpart, the Plebiscite Commissariat for Germany (Plebiszit-Kommissariat für Deutschland), had its seat in Katowice and was led from April 1920 by Kurt Urbanek, the mayor of Rozbark (Rossberg) near Bytom. Korol-Chudy notes that it was less central to the German effort than Korfanty's office was to the Polish one, because many German associations worked alongside it. The most important were the associations of "Upper Silesians loyal to the homeland" (heimattreue Oberschlesier), which campaigned for Germany and organized the journey of eligible voters from the rest of the Reich. Their handbook for the vote, published in Breslau in 1920, guided voters through the rules.10

Propaganda and violence
Both sides ran an intense propaganda campaign, with posters, leaflets and the press. Both promised prosperity and threatened ruin: Polish posters spoke of freedom, German ones of lasting prosperity in Germany and poverty and emigration under Poland.11

The campaign was also violent. The Polish risings of August 1919 and August 1920, the first two Silesian Uprisings, framed it. The second, which broke out after a Polish doctor, Andrzej Mielęcki, was killed during riots in Katowice in August 1920, forced the commission to dissolve the Sipo and set up a plebiscite police of Poles and Germans. Tooley's study of German political violence and the German historian Maren Hachmeister both show the other side of the coin: pro-German Upper Silesians also fled the violence of Polish insurgents, while pro-Polish ones fled German paramilitaries.12
Who could vote: the outvoters dispute
The treaty gave the vote to every man and woman who would be 20 years old on 1 January of the year of the vote and who had been born in the plebiscite area or had lived there since a date the commission would fix.13
The clause on people born in the area but living elsewhere caused the bitterest quarrel. Hundreds of thousands of Upper Silesians had left to work in western Germany, and Fic writes that both sides at first welcomed the rule: Warsaw counted on Polish-speaking emigrants in Westphalia and the Rhineland, Berlin on former officials and settled workers loyal to Germany. Polish diplomats then tried to make the outvoters cast their ballots weeks after the residents, or outside the area, but the final rules let everyone vote on the same day.14
The counts of these outvoters differ. The State Department's annotations give 191,154 outvoters and non-domiciled natives, and the IPN 191,303. The joint German-Polish textbook commission rounds the figure to about 200,000. Germany brought many of them in by train, a good number from the Ruhr, and most of them voted for Germany.15
The Polish side argued that this imported vote distorted the result and that German officials had far easier access to the emigrants' data and to the emigrants themselves, and could just as easily make the journey hard for pro-Polish Upper Silesians in western Germany. The German side's answer rested on the treaty itself: the outvoters were Upper Silesians by birth with a right written into Article 88. The joint textbook commission of German and Polish historians concluded in 1976 that the participation of Upper Silesians from the Reich, provided for by the treaty and promoted by Germany, did influence the outcome.16
Voting day, 20 March 1921
The vote took place on Sunday, 20 March 1921, which was Palm Sunday. Polling ran under Allied guard, and French tanks stood in the streets of Katowice.17

Upper Silesia plebiscite results
Turnout was about 97.5 percent. Of about 1.19 million votes cast, Germany received 707,393 to 707,605 and Poland 479,359 to 479,365, depending on the count: 59.4 to 59.7 percent for Germany and 40.3 percent for Poland.18
Counted by communes, as the treaty required, the picture changed. By the State Department's count, 678 communes and manor districts (42.5 percent) voted for Poland and 844 for Germany, while the IPN puts the Polish share at 44.7 percent of communes. The towns, including those of the industrial district, voted mostly German, while much of the countryside in the south and east voted Polish.19

Competing partition lines
Both sides claimed victory. The German government demanded the whole plebiscite area, arguing that the overall majority had spoken and that the region could not be divided. On 22 March 1921 Korfanty answered with a proclamation and a line of his own, the Korfanty Line, which ran from Bohumín on the Czechoslovak border along the Oder toward Opole and then to the Polish border. By Korfanty's own reckoning, as the IPN historians Renata Skoczek and Mirosław Węcki report, it would have given Poland 59.1 percent of the area and 70.1 percent of its people.20
The commission could not agree. The British and Italian members proposed what IPN historians call the Percival-de Marinis Line, which would have given Poland little more than the districts of Pszczyna (Pless) and Rybnik and left the industrial towns with Germany. In the end the commission passed conflicting proposals to the Allies instead of an agreed frontier.21
The Third Silesian Uprising and Annaberg
According to Fic, reports that the Percival-de Marinis Line was gaining ground led Korfanty to agree to a rising. The Third Silesian Uprising began on the night of 2 to 3 May 1921 and lasted until 5 July, an armed demonstration, in the words of the Polish Senate, of the will to join Poland. German volunteer units of the Selbstschutz fought back, and the best-known battle was fought for Góra Świętej Anny (Annaberg), which German units stormed on 21 May (23 May in the German Historical Museum's account).22 › The Silesian Uprisings, 1919 to 1921
The League of Nations decides
The Allies still could not agree, and on 12 August 1921 they referred the question to the Council of the League of Nations. The Council handed it to a committee of four of its members, which the IPN historian Mirosław Węcki lists as China, Belgium, Brazil and Spain. On 12 October 1921 the Council unanimously recommended a frontier line. It concluded that the industrial region had to be divided, and to keep its economy working it proposed transitional rules for railways, water, power, currency, coal and the movement of people, together with protection for minorities.23
The Conference of Ambassadors adopted the recommendation as its decision on 20 October 1921.24
What Poland received
Poland received about 29 percent of the plebiscite area and about 46 percent of its people (47 percent in a 1922 American estimate), including Katowice, Królewska Huta (Chorzów), Rybnik, Pszczyna, Tarnowskie Góry and Lubliniec. Germany kept the larger, mostly agricultural part, about seven-tenths of the area, together with the industrial cities of Bytom and Gliwice.25
The industrial balance was the other way round. The historian Georg Eckert notes that Poland received the heart of the industrial region, with most of the iron and steel mills and most of the chemical industry. American trade figures cited by Finch put about three-quarters of the region's coal output, all of its zinc mines and works and half of its steel capacity on the Polish side. In Germany the decision caused outrage across the political parties.26
The Geneva Convention and the handover
Germany and Poland then negotiated the details. The German-Polish Convention on Upper Silesia, signed in Geneva on 15 May 1922, was to run for 15 years and kept the divided region working as one economic unit while protecting minorities on both sides. The Polish Sejm approved it on 24 May 1922, ratifications were exchanged in Opole on 3 June, and it remained in force until 1937.27
Polish troops under Gen. Stanisław Szeptycki crossed the old border at Szopienice on 20 June 1922 and entered Katowice the same day. The other districts followed, Rybnik last on 4 July, and the act of taking over Upper Silesia was signed in Katowice on 16 July 1922.28
Two memories of one vote
In Germany the partition left a lasting grievance. The German Historical Museum calls the partition unfavorable to Germany and records the outrage it caused across the parties. A 2022 University of Wuppertal interview with Eckert recalls the verdict of the Upper Silesian politician Hans Lukaschek that the episode undermined the German people's faith in justice, and Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann notes that Annaberg became a symbol of the German "Volkstumskampf," the struggle for nationhood, in the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich. The joint textbook commission wrote that the national struggles in Upper Silesia helped create an exaggerated German nationalism and its historical myth.29
In Poland the plebiscite is remembered as part of the fight that, with the uprisings, brought part of Upper Silesia into the reborn state. The Senate marked the centenary of the Third Uprising in 2021 by recalling the vote and the share of the area and people that Poland won, and since 2022 Poland has marked 20 June, the day Polish troops entered Katowice, as the National Day of the Silesian Uprisings. Recent scholarship, such as Karch's study of loyalty and Tooley's work on the vote, reads the result less as a census of nations than as a choice made by people of mixed loyalties under heavy pressure.30
The vote completed the western border that Versailles had left open, alongside the Greater Poland Uprising and the Treaty of Versailles, while in the east the frontier was decided in the Polish-Soviet War and by the Treaty of Riga.
Notes
A number in the text points to a note. Each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.
- University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. ↩
- Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”. Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”. ↩
- George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. ↩
- Treaty of Peace with Germany, “Article 88 and Annex”. Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. ↩
- Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. ↩
- Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Institute of National Remembrance, “Second Silesian Uprising”. Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. ↩
- Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. ↩
- Brian Gebhart, “Nation and Loyalty in a German-Polish Borderland”. T. Hunt Tooley, “German Political Violence and the Border Plebiscite in Upper Silesia, 1919-1921”. Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”. ↩
- Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”. ↩
- Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Institute of National Remembrance, “Second Silesian Uprising”. Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”. Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”. ↩
- Institute of National Remembrance, “Second Silesian Uprising”. Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”. ↩
- Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. Institute of National Remembrance, “Second Silesian Uprising”. T. Hunt Tooley, “German Political Violence and the Border Plebiscite in Upper Silesia, 1919-1921”. Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”. Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”. Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”. ↩
- Treaty of Peace with Germany, “Article 88 and Annex”. Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. ↩
- Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. Treaty of Peace with Germany, “Article 88 and Annex”. Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”. ↩
- Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. ↩
- Treaty of Peace with Germany, “Article 88 and Annex”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. ↩
- Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. ↩
- Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”. ↩
- Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Institute of National Remembrance, “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. ↩
- Renata Skoczek, “Ideas for the Division of Upper Silesia After the Plebiscite”. Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”. ↩
- Renata Skoczek, “Ideas for the Division of Upper Silesia After the Plebiscite”. Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. ↩
- Maciej Fic, “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”. Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”. Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. ↩
- George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. Office of the Historian, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919. ↩
- Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. ↩
- Mirosław Węcki, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”. Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. ↩
- University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”. Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. ↩
- Act of 24 May 1922 on the ratification of the German-Polish Convention on Upper Silesia signed at Geneva on 15 May 1922, “protocol of the exchange of ratifications, Opole, 3 June 1922”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”. ↩
- Grzegorz Bębnik, “Jak władze polskie przejmowały województwo śląskie”. Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”. Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. Piotr Rygus and Bartosz Wesołowski, “Był to dzień niezapomniany. Droga generała Stanisława Szeptyckiego na Górny Śląsk”. Ryszard Kaczmarek, “Opis wkroczenia na teren plebiscytowy Wojska Polskiego i Reichswehry w 1922 roku na łamach Der Oberschlesische Wanderer”. ↩
- Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”. University of Wuppertal, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”. Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”. Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”. ↩
- Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”. Act of 12 May 2022, “o ustanowieniu Narodowego Dnia Powstań Śląskich”. Grzegorz Bębnik, “Jak władze polskie przejmowały województwo śląskie”. Brian Gebhart, “Nation and Loyalty in a German-Polish Borderland”. T. Hunt Tooley, “German Political Violence and the Border Plebiscite in Upper Silesia, 1919-1921”. ↩
Sources
- University of Wuppertal, Jahr100Wissen, “The Cession of East Upper Silesia to Poland”, interview with the historian Georg Eckert, 13 April 2022
- Arnulf Scriba, “Die Teilung Oberschlesiens 1921”, LeMO (Lebendiges Museum Online), Deutsches Historisches Museum (in German)
- Joint German-Polish Textbook Commission, recommendations for history and geography textbooks (1976), section 17, printed in “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 47/1977”, Federal Agency for Civic Education (bpb) (in German)
- Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), “The Upper Silesian plebiscite of 20 March 1921: the course of voting”, digital resources
- Maren Hachmeister, “(Kein) Flüchtling sein. Registrierung von Ortswechseln während der Volksabstimmung in Oberschlesien”, Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (2020), doi:10.24425/historie.2020.133250 (in German)
- Sabine Bamberger-Stemmann, “Oberschlesien nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Polnische Untersuchungen der Jahre 1989 bis 1993 zu einer Phase des Umbruches in Europa”, Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung 46 (1997), no. 4, pp. 561-572 (in German)
- George A. Finch, “Upper Silesia”, American Journal of International Law 16, no. 1 (January 1922), pp. 75-80, doi:10.2307/2187815
- Maciej Fic (University of Silesia), “Najbardziej demokratyczna forma wyboru? Uwarunkowania plebiscytu z 20 marca 1921 roku na Górnym Śląsku”, Echa Przeszłości XXI/2 (2020), pp. 253-282, doi:10.31648/ep.6355 (in Polish)
- Treaty of Peace with Germany (Treaty of Versailles), 28 June 1919, Part III, Section VIII, “Article 88 and Annex”, The Avalon Project, Yale Law School
- Muzeum Czynu Powstańczego, Góra Świętej Anny (branch of the Muzeum Śląska Opolskiego, Opole), “Polsko-niemiecka walka o Górny Śląsk. Powstania śląskie 1919-1920-1921”, educational presentation (in Polish)
- Office of the Historian, U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, vol. XIII, “Section VIII, Poland (Articles 87 to 93)”, treaty text with the State Department’s annotations to Article 88 and its Annex (Washington, 1947)
- Mirosław Węcki, Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), Przystanek Historia, “Plebiscyt i III Powstanie Śląskie 1921 roku”, 2023 (in Polish)
- Aleksandra Korol-Chudy, “Katowice w centrum powstań śląskich i plebiscytu 1919-1922. Przewodnik historyczno-edukacyjny”, Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), Katowice branch, 2025 (in Polish)
- Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), Walka o granice, “Second Silesian Uprising”
- Brian Gebhart, “Nation and Loyalty in a German-Polish Borderland: Upper Silesia, 1848-1960 by Brendan Karch” (review of Brendan Karch, Cambridge University Press, 2018), EuropeNow (Council for European Studies), January 2020
- T. Hunt Tooley, “German Political Violence and the Border Plebiscite in Upper Silesia, 1919-1921”, Central European History 21, no. 1 (1988), pp. 56-98, doi:10.1017/S0008938900012668
- Marius Urbanik, “"Hetzer Korfanty" oder "Meister der Reklame"? Wojciech Korfanty als polnischer Abstimmungskommissar und Diktator des Aufstandes in der Berichterstattung der liberalen deutschen Tagespresse”, Zaranie Śląskie 8 (2022), pp. 24-44, doi:10.24917/ZaranieSlaskie.8.2 (in German)
- Senate of the Republic of Poland, “Uchwała Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 12 maja 2021 r. w 100-lecie III Powstania Śląskiego”, Monitor Polski 2021, item 475 (in Polish)
- Renata Skoczek, Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), “Ideas for the Division of Upper Silesia After the Plebiscite”, 7 May 2021
- Act of 24 May 1922 on the ratification of the German-Polish Convention on Upper Silesia signed at Geneva on 15 May 1922, and “protocol of the exchange of ratifications, Opole, 3 June 1922”, Dziennik Ustaw 1922, no. 44, items 370 to 372 (in Polish)
- Grzegorz Bębnik, Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), “Jak władze polskie przejmowały województwo śląskie” (in Polish)
- Piotr Rygus and Bartosz Wesołowski, “Był to dzień niezapomniany. Droga generała Stanisława Szeptyckiego na Górny Śląsk”, exhibition catalogue, Muzeum Śląskie, Katowice, 2022 (in Polish)
- Ryszard Kaczmarek (University of Silesia), “Opis wkroczenia na teren plebiscytowy Wojska Polskiego i Reichswehry w 1922 roku na łamach Der Oberschlesische Wanderer”, Zaranie Śląskie 8 (2022), pp. 45-57, doi:10.24917/ZaranieSlaskie.8.3 (in Polish)
- Act of 12 May 2022 “o ustanowieniu Narodowego Dnia Powstań Śląskich”, Dziennik Ustaw 2022, item 1229 (in Polish)






