PLEnlist

Battle of Anzio, 1944: the landing that was meant to open the road to Rome

Second World War · 22 January to 5 June 1944 · Allies vs Germany · ~6 min read · Updated October 2026

Next anniversary: 22 January 2027, the 83rd anniversary 22 January in history ›

Black and white photograph from a ship at sea: a landing ship low on the water, a tall white column of spray from a bomb burst behind it, and hills on the horizon.

U.S. Navy photograph, German air attack on the Anzio invasion force on 22 January 1944, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

At a glance

Allies (United States, Britain)Gen. Harold Alexander; Lt. Gen. Mark W. Clark; Maj. Gen. John P. Lucas, later Maj. Gen. Lucian Truscott (VI Corps)
vs
GermanyField Marshal Albert Kesselring; Gen. Eberhard von Mackensen (Fourteenth Army)
Date
Landing 22 January 1944; beachhead fighting until the breakout in late May; Rome entered 4 June 1944
Location
Anzio and Nettuno on the coast of Lazio, about 35 miles (56 km) south of Rome
War
Second World War, Italian campaign
Landing force
Two reinforced divisions, U.S. 3rd and British 1st, with Rangers, Commandos and paratroops; more than 36,000 men ashore by the end of the first day
Losses
More than 23,000 British and American combat casualties, about 4,400 killed (NHHC)
Outcome
Tactical surprise but no breakthrough; a four month siege ended by the breakout in May 1944
Quick answer

What happened at Anzio in 1944?

On 22 January 1944 the U.S. VI Corps landed at Anzio, about 35 miles south of Rome, to outflank the German Gustav Line. The landing achieved total surprise, but its commander, Major General John P. Lucas, spent a week consolidating, and Field Marshal Albert Kesselring sealed off the beachhead. The Allies were besieged there for four months and broke out only in May, when the Gustav Line finally gave way.1

Anzio was meant to be a short cut. It became one of the most argued over battles of the Italian campaign, a landing that caught the Germans completely off guard and then spent four months fighting for its life within sight of the Alban Hills.2

A landing behind the Gustav Line

By the end of 1943 the Allied armies in Italy were stuck in front of the Gustav Line, roughly halfway between Salerno and Rome. A landing behind it was the obvious answer, and Kesselring feared one throughout the campaign. The problem was shipping: most of the landing craft in the Mediterranean were due to leave for Britain and the invasion of Normandy. General Mark Clark recommended cancelling the operation on 18 December, and General Harold Alexander agreed.3

Winston Churchill revived it. Recovering from pneumonia in Tunis, he threw his weight behind the plan and persuaded Roosevelt to keep the tank landing ships in the Mediterranean into February. The operation, code named Shingle, would put the U.S. VI Corps ashore at Anzio, a resort town about 35 miles south of Rome, far behind the Gustav Line, while Clark's Fifth Army attacked the line itself.4

Its aim was never clear. Early plans had VI Corps seize the Alban Hills, about 20 miles inland, and cut the roads that supplied the German front. Clark feared that would leave the corps overextended, so his orders only asked Lucas to "advance on" the hills. The force was two reinforced divisions, the U.S. 3rd and the British 1st. The naval historian Samuel Eliot Morison later wrote that the job needed a full army or nothing, and that two divisions meant sending a boy on a man's errand, as the Naval History and Heritage Command account quotes him.5

Total surprise

The supporting offensive failed before the landing began: the attacks across the Garigliano and the Rapido at Cassino were thrown back between 17 and 22 January. They did, however, pull two German divisions away from the coast, so Shingle hit a stretch held by two worn out battalions.6

Task Force 81 under Rear Admiral Frank J. Lowry sailed from Naples on 21 January and the landings began at 2 a.m. on 22 January. Resistance ashore was almost nothing. Anzio and Nettuno were taken intact, and by nightfall more than 36,000 men and 3,000 vehicles were ashore with light losses. The roads to the Alban Hills, and to Rome, were open.7

A week of caution

Lucas did not use the opening. He did not believe in the operation, thought his force too small and expected an immediate counterattack, and Clark had warned him not to stick his neck out. While he built up the beachhead, Kesselring and Hitler moved faster. Troops came from northern Italy, France, Germany and Yugoslavia, and within twenty four hours the Germans had a thin but complete ring around the beachhead; by the fourth day parts of eight divisions were on the perimeter.8

The Luftwaffe struck at the ships offshore with bombs, torpedoes and new radio guided weapons. The destroyer HMS Janus was sunk on 23 January and the cruiser HMS Spartan on 29 January; according to the Naval History and Heritage Command, the British hospital ship St. David was sunk on 24 January.9

Lucas attacked only on 30 January, with about 70,000 men. By then the Germans matched him. The British reached Campoleone but could not hold it, and two battalions of U.S. Rangers who tried to infiltrate Cisterna along an irrigation ditch were ambushed; according to John Rickard of HistoryOfWar.org only six of the 767 Rangers got back.10

The German counterattacks

General Eberhard von Mackensen's Fourteenth Army now tried to cut the beachhead in two along the road from Albano to Anzio. The attacks began on 3 February, retook Aprilia, which the troops called the Factory, and peaked on 16 February with, in Rickard's figures, about 125,000 Germans against some 100,000 Allied troops. Pushed back almost to its last line, the U.S. 45th Division held, helped by heavy artillery, naval gunfire and hundreds of air sorties a day. A last attack at the end of February also failed.11

On 22 February Clark replaced Lucas with Major General Lucian Truscott of the 3rd Division. The Navy history calls Lucas a convenient scapegoat for the failure of the operation.12

Siege and breakout

For three months the beachhead lived under German guns, including two 280 mm railroad guns the soldiers called Anzio Annie and the Anzio Express. There was no rear area; even the field hospitals were hit. The sea kept it alive: trucks loaded in Naples rolled on and off landing ships, and more than 500,000 tons of supplies reached Anzio, about 4,000 tons a day.13

The deadlock broke at Cassino. In May the Allies cracked the Gustav Line, and on 25 May troops from the main front met the Anzio garrison. Alexander wanted Truscott to drive on Valmontone and trap the German Tenth Army; Clark sent most of the force toward Rome instead, one of the most debated decisions of the campaign. U.S. troops entered Rome on 4 June 1944, two days before the landings in Normandy took the headlines.14

Shingle cost more than 23,000 British and American combat casualties, about 4,400 of them killed, according to the Naval History and Heritage Command. It never opened the road to Rome as planned, but it drew German divisions away from Cassino and France, and its troops took part in the final drive on the capital.15

Notes

A number in the text points to a note; each note names the works that paragraph draws on, listed in full under Sources.

  1. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  2. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”. ↩
  3. Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”; John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XVII”. ↩
  4. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XVII”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  5. Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XVII”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XX”. ↩
  6. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XX”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XVIII”. ↩
  7. Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XX”; John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”. ↩
  8. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XX”. ↩
  9. Naval-History.net, “Royal Navy in the Mediterranean, 1943-1944”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  10. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XXII”. ↩
  11. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XXII”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XXIV”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  12. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Martin Blumenson, “Chapter XXIV”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  13. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  14. John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”; Ernest F. Fisher Jr., “Chapter VIII”; Ernest F. Fisher Jr., “Chapter VI”; Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”. ↩
  15. Naval History and Heritage Command, “Operation Shingle”; John Rickard, “Operation Shingle - Battle of Anzio, 22 January-5 June 1944”. ↩

Sources

Frequently asked questions

When did the Battle of Anzio take place?

The landing was on 22 January 1944. The fighting around the beachhead lasted until the breakout in late May, and Allied troops entered Rome on 4 June 1944.

Why did the Allies land at Anzio?

To get behind the German Gustav Line, which had stopped the Allied advance in Italy, threaten the roads to the front and open the way to Rome.

Who commanded at Anzio?

Major General John P. Lucas led the U.S. VI Corps until 22 February 1944, when Lucian Truscott replaced him. Field Marshal Albert Kesselring and General Eberhard von Mackensen led the German side.

Why is Anzio controversial?

The landing caught the Germans by surprise, but Lucas spent a week consolidating instead of pushing inland, and the Germans sealed off the beachhead. Later Clark's choice to head for Rome rather than Valmontone was also criticized.

How many casualties were there at Anzio?

The Naval History and Heritage Command gives more than 23,000 British and American combat casualties, about 4,400 of them killed in action.

Battle honours of your homeland

The turning points of history

Marathon, Gaugamela, Cannae, Constantinople, Waterloo, Stalingrad: the days the world changed course.

Based on your country, which we do not store · why? ·

Push inland from the beach at Anzio

Echoes of Battle brings the great battles of history to life, scene by scene on the real map. Enlist below and we will send word to your inbox the day it launches.

Or supply the campaign on Ko-fi ›