They are two of the greatest conquerors who ever lived, separated by more than a thousand years and half a world. Genghis Khan forged from the steppe the empire that would become the largest contiguous land empire in history; Julius Caesar conquered Gaul and reshaped Rome itself. They never met, but the comparison is irresistible. Here they are, side by side.
Head to head
| Genghis Khan | Julius Caesar | |
|---|---|---|
| Lived | about 1162 to 12271 | 100 to 44 BC2 |
| Role | Founder and khan of the Mongol Empire | Roman general, dictator and conqueror |
| Great achievement | Founder of what became history's largest contiguous land empire | The conquest of Gaul |
| Strength | Mobility, organisation and total war | Speed, daring and political mastery |
| Defeated | Khwarazm, Jin China and many more1 | Vercingetorix at Alesia, Pompey at Pharsalus |
| Rule | United the Mongol tribes and built an empire3 | Made himself master of Rome |
| Legacy | The conqueror who remade half the world | The man who ended the Roman Republic |
Genghis Khan: the conqueror from the steppe
Genghis Khan united the warring tribes of the steppe and turned them into the most formidable army of the age, built on speed, discipline and ruthless organisation. In a single lifetime he conquered from northern China deep into central Asia, laying the foundation of what, under his heirs, would become the largest contiguous land empire the world has ever seen4.

Caesar: the conqueror who remade Rome
Julius Caesar conquered Gaul, crushing the great revolt of Vercingetorix5 at Alesia in 52 BC, then turned on Rome itself6, beating Pompey at Pharsalus in 48 BC. Master of the Roman world2, he made himself dictator and, in doing so, brought the Republic to its end, until his assassination in 44 BC6.

The verdict
They conquered on utterly different scales and in different ways, so the contest is one of imagination. Genghis Khan built by far the larger empire, remaking the map of Asia and Europe in a single generation; Caesar conquered less ground but struck at the heart of a civilisation, ending a Republic and opening the way to an empire whose name still echoes. The steppe conqueror had the greater reach; the Roman had the deeper legacy. Which counts for more is a matter of taste.

Compare more in Genghis Khan vs Alexander and Alexander vs Caesar, or meet the field in the greatest military commanders.
Sources
Each commander above has a full biography on this site, with its own sources. Judgements of who was "greater" are ours and openly a matter of debate; the facts and dates follow established histories. See our editorial approach.
